INSTITUTIONAL NETWORK OF THE PEAT ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PLAN IN RIAU PROVINCE: HIERARCHY AND CLASSIFICATION APPROACHES

 

"INSTITUTIONAL NETWORK OF THE PEAT ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PLAN IN RIAU PROVINCE: HIERARCHY AND CLASSIFICATION APPROACHES"



Author(s)

Tatan Sukwika, Laila Febrina, Ira Mulyawati

Abstract

Government institutions, both central and local, have issued many policies and regulatory products related to tropical peatland management. Still, peatland degradation and conversion and even land fires continue to occur in Riau. The role of an effective and synergistic institutional network is essential and strategic for its existence. This paper analyzes the dominant role of key institutions in the arena of action for the peat ecosystem restoration plan and formulates a model of the institutional network. The method used is applying systematic and iterative graphic theory with institutional analysis tools, namely ISM or Interpretative Structure Modeling. The study results obtained three classifications of peat ecosystem restoration institutional networks based on critical institutions' main tasks and functions: institutional coordination, cooperation, and assistance/guidance programs. The conclusion drawn is that based on the institutional network model, it is known that cooperative institutions facilitate the maturation of the concept of peat restoration against the jointly planned program. The policy implication is strengthening the synergy of multi-stakeholder institutions formed as a critical factor in the management of sustainable peat restoration.

 
Keywords

Institutional, ISM, peatland, restoration, sustainability

 
Full Text:
PDF (Indonesian)
or
PDF (Indonesian) 

 

How to cite:

Sukwika, Tatan., Febrina, Laila ., & Mulyawati Ira. (2022). Institutional network of the peat ecosystem restoration plan in Riau Province: Hierarchy and classification approaches. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 976 012019. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/976/1/012019  

IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science by https://iopscience.iop.org/journalList is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 
 
References 

[1]    Adji F F, Darung U, and Silva K M 2020 Jurnal Informasi 72 26-34

[2]  Arts B and Buizer M 2009 Forest policy and economics 115(6) 340-347

[3]  Blackham G V, Webb E L and Corlett R T 2014 Forest Ecology and Management 32(4) 8-15

[4]  BRG 2017 Contingency plan – BRG restoration target based on priority restoration criteria
(Jakarta: Peatland Restoration Agency)

[5]  Clarke D and Rieley J 2010 Strategy for responsible peatland management (Finland: International
Peat Society)

[6]  Dohong A, Aziz A A, and Dargusch P 2017 Land use policy 69 349-360

[7]  Fischer F and Miller G J 2017 Handbook of public policy analysis: theory politics and methods
(Florida: Routledge)

[8]  Hansson A, and Dargusch P 2018 Case studies in the environment 2(1) 1-8

[9]  Hashemnezhad H 2015 Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics JELTAL 31 54-62

[10]  Horlings I, and Padt F 2013 Sustainable Development 216 413-424

[11]  Lounsbury M 2008 Accounting Organizations and Society 334(5) 349-361

[12]  Maulana S, Syaufina L, Prasetyo L and Aidi M 2019 Formulating peatland fire prevention
strategy in Bengkalis Regency: An application of analytical hierarchy process Paper presented
at the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

[13]  Muslimin I 2018 Kajian paludikultur untuk restorasi lahan gambut bekas kebakaran di kabupaten
Oki Sumatera Selatan (Palembang: BP2LHK)

[14]  Page S, Hoscilo A, Langner A, Tansey K, Siegert F, Limin S and Rieley J 2009 Tropical peatland
fires in Southeast Asia In Tropical fire ecology (Berlin: Springer)

[15]  Safitri M A 2018 Peatland Restoration and Transboundary Haze Pollution: Law and Institutional
Change in Indonesia Paper presented at the Harmonization of Asean Law to Actualize The
Asean Economic Community” Bengkulu 11-12 October 2018 Universitas Bengkulu

[16]  Saxena J P, Sushil, and Vrat P 1992 Systems Practice 56 651-670

[17]  Saxena J P, Sushil and Vrat P 2006 Policy and strategy formulation: An application of flexible
systems methodology (New Delhi: GIFT Publishing)

[18]  Sugiyono 2017 Methods of quantitative qualitative and Rand  (Bandung: Alfabeta)

[19]  Sukwika T 2018 ournal of Regional and Rural Development Planning 2(2) 133-150

[20]  Sukwika T, Yusuf D N, and Suwandhi I 2020 Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 26(1) 59-71

[21]  Sukwika T and Fransisca L 2021 Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research 8(2) 135-157

PENENTUAN FAKTOR KUNCI UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN PENGELOLAAN TPST-BANTARGEBANG BERKELANJUTAN: PENDEKATAN MICMAC

 

"DETERMINATION OF KEY FACTORS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE TPST-BANTARGEBANG MANAGEMENT: THE MICMAC APPROACH"



Author(s)

Tatan Sukwika

Abstract

The development of the area in the TPST-Bantargebang moved by conditions of decreasing capacity in the zone. The resulting negative externalities have had an impact on social and environmental conflicts for the surrounding community. The success of developing an area is determined by the existence and effectiveness of the roles of each stakeholder involved. Therefore, this study is important to do, especially for the development of sustainable management of TPST-Bantargebang. The objective of this research focused on finding the key factors driving the development of TPST-Bantargebang management. The method used is the MICMAC analysis approach. Retrieval of data through interviews key informants (experts) that determined based on the results of the snowball method. The results of the analysis show that there are important key factors, namely the development of human resource capacity and environmental carrying capacity. It recommended that the management of the TPST-Bantargebang establish a development scenario for the development of the TPST-Bantargebang based on these two key factors are in the social and environmental dimensions.

 
Keywords

key factor; MICMAC; integrated waste management; TPST-Bantargebang

 
Full Text:
PDF (Indonesian)
or
PDF (Indonesian) 

 

How to cite:

Sukwika, Tatan. (2021). Penentuan faktor kunci untuk pengembangan pengelolaan TPST-Bantargebang berkelanjutan: Pendekatan MICMAC. TATALOKA, 23(4), 524-535. doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.23.4.524-535  

Jurnal TATALOKA by https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka/index is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 
 
References 

Ahmed, M. T., Saleh, M., Abdelkadir, A. F., & Abdelrahim, A. (2009). El Maghara scenario a search for sustainability and equity: An Egyptian case study. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(2), 55–90

Aprilia, A. (2016). Household solid waste management in Jakarta, Indonesia: Evaluation on human behaviour, economy, and GHG emissions. (PhD Thesis), Kyoto University, Japan

Ariyani, N., Prasetya, T., & Gilang, K. (2018). Prospective structural method application to identify strategic variable of developing ecotourism region in reservoir area. Paper presented at the AFBE International Conference 6-7 December 2018, Jakarta Indonesia
 

Aryeti. (2011). Peningkatan peranserta masyarakat melalui gerakan menabung pada bank sampah di kelurahan Babakan Surabaya, Bandung. Jurnal Permukiman, 6(1), 40-46. doi: 10.31815/jp.2011.6.40-46

Attri, R., Dev, N., & Sharm, V. (2013). Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: An overview. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 2(2), 3-8

Ejdys, J., Matuszak-Flejszman, A., Szymanski, M., Ustinovichius, L., Shevchenko, G., & Lulewicz-Sas, A. (2016). Crucial factors for improving the ISO 14001 environmental management system. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(1), 52-73. doi: 10.3846/16111699.2015.1065905

Godet, M., & Durance, P. (2011). Strategic foresight: For corporate and regional development. Paris: Dunod

Joshi, R., & Ahmed, S. (2016). Status and challenges of municipal solid waste management in India: A review. Cogent Environmental Science, 2(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1080/23311843.2016.1139434

Khan, U., & Haleem, A. (2012). Smart organisations: Modelling of enablers using an integrated ISM and Fuzzy-MICMAC approach. Int. J. Intelligent Enterprise, 1(3/4), 248–269

Manurung, D., Bintoro, H. M. H., Hadi, S., & Lubis, I. (2016). Analysis of related area preference with regional sanitary landfill in temporary Bantargebang sanitary landfill using topsis method. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan, 17(2), 73-81. doi: 10.29122/jtl.v17i2.27

Mayangkara, A. P. (2016). Evaluasi kebijakan pengelolaan sampah TPA gunung panggung kabupaten Tuban. Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 2(2), 427-444

Nazarko, J., Ejdys, J., Halicka, K., Nazarko, Ł., Kononiuk, A., & Olszewska, A. (2017). Structural analysis as an instrument for identification of critical drivers of technology development. Procedia Engineering, 182, 474-481. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.137

Noviana, L., & Sukwika, T. (2020). Pemanfaatan sampah organik sebagai pupuk kompos ramah lingkungan di kelurahan Bhaktijaya Depok. Pengabdian Untukmu Negeri, 4(2), 237-241. doi: 10.37859/jpumri.v4i2.2155

Omran, A., Khorish, M., & Saleh, M. (2014). Structural Analysis with Knowledge-based MICMAC Approach. International Journal of Computer Applications, 86(5), 39-43. doi: 10.5120/14985-3290

Paramita, D., Murtilaksono, K., & Manuwoto. (2018). Kajian pengelolaan sampah berdasarkan daya dukung dan kapasitas tampung prasarana persampahan kota Depok. Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning, 2(2), 104-117. doi: 10.29244/jp2wd.2018.2.2.104-117

Sudirman. (2012). Implementasi 3R melalui bank sampah. Jakarta: Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup

Sujiyanto. (2016). Analisis pengelolaan sampah di bank sampah malang. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 5(3), 115-122

Sukwika, T. (2018). Peran pembangunan infrastruktur terhadap ketimpangan ekonomi antarwilayah di Indonesia. Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan, 6(2), 115-130. doi: 10.14710/jwl.6.2.115-130

Sukwika, T., & Noviana, L. (2020). Status keberlanjutan pengelolaan sampah terpadu di TPST-Bantargebang, Bekasi: Menggunakan rapfish dengan R statistik. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 18(1), 107-118. doi: 10.14710/jil.18.1.107-118