PENENTUAN FAKTOR KUNCI UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN PENGELOLAAN TPST-BANTARGEBANG BERKELANJUTAN: PENDEKATAN MICMAC

 

"DETERMINATION OF KEY FACTORS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE TPST-BANTARGEBANG MANAGEMENT: THE MICMAC APPROACH"



Author(s)

Tatan Sukwika

Abstract

The development of the area in the TPST-Bantargebang moved by conditions of decreasing capacity in the zone. The resulting negative externalities have had an impact on social and environmental conflicts for the surrounding community. The success of developing an area is determined by the existence and effectiveness of the roles of each stakeholder involved. Therefore, this study is important to do, especially for the development of sustainable management of TPST-Bantargebang. The objective of this research focused on finding the key factors driving the development of TPST-Bantargebang management. The method used is the MICMAC analysis approach. Retrieval of data through interviews key informants (experts) that determined based on the results of the snowball method. The results of the analysis show that there are important key factors, namely the development of human resource capacity and environmental carrying capacity. It recommended that the management of the TPST-Bantargebang establish a development scenario for the development of the TPST-Bantargebang based on these two key factors are in the social and environmental dimensions.

 
Keywords

key factor; MICMAC; integrated waste management; TPST-Bantargebang

 
Full Text:
PDF (Indonesian)
or
PDF (Indonesian) 

 

How to cite:

Sukwika, Tatan. (2021). Penentuan faktor kunci untuk pengembangan pengelolaan TPST-Bantargebang berkelanjutan: Pendekatan MICMAC. TATALOKA, 23(4), 524-535. doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.23.4.524-535  

Jurnal TATALOKA by https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka/index is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 
 
References 

Ahmed, M. T., Saleh, M., Abdelkadir, A. F., & Abdelrahim, A. (2009). El Maghara scenario a search for sustainability and equity: An Egyptian case study. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(2), 55–90

Aprilia, A. (2016). Household solid waste management in Jakarta, Indonesia: Evaluation on human behaviour, economy, and GHG emissions. (PhD Thesis), Kyoto University, Japan

Ariyani, N., Prasetya, T., & Gilang, K. (2018). Prospective structural method application to identify strategic variable of developing ecotourism region in reservoir area. Paper presented at the AFBE International Conference 6-7 December 2018, Jakarta Indonesia
 

Aryeti. (2011). Peningkatan peranserta masyarakat melalui gerakan menabung pada bank sampah di kelurahan Babakan Surabaya, Bandung. Jurnal Permukiman, 6(1), 40-46. doi: 10.31815/jp.2011.6.40-46

Attri, R., Dev, N., & Sharm, V. (2013). Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: An overview. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 2(2), 3-8

Ejdys, J., Matuszak-Flejszman, A., Szymanski, M., Ustinovichius, L., Shevchenko, G., & Lulewicz-Sas, A. (2016). Crucial factors for improving the ISO 14001 environmental management system. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(1), 52-73. doi: 10.3846/16111699.2015.1065905

Godet, M., & Durance, P. (2011). Strategic foresight: For corporate and regional development. Paris: Dunod

Joshi, R., & Ahmed, S. (2016). Status and challenges of municipal solid waste management in India: A review. Cogent Environmental Science, 2(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1080/23311843.2016.1139434

Khan, U., & Haleem, A. (2012). Smart organisations: Modelling of enablers using an integrated ISM and Fuzzy-MICMAC approach. Int. J. Intelligent Enterprise, 1(3/4), 248–269

Manurung, D., Bintoro, H. M. H., Hadi, S., & Lubis, I. (2016). Analysis of related area preference with regional sanitary landfill in temporary Bantargebang sanitary landfill using topsis method. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan, 17(2), 73-81. doi: 10.29122/jtl.v17i2.27

Mayangkara, A. P. (2016). Evaluasi kebijakan pengelolaan sampah TPA gunung panggung kabupaten Tuban. Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 2(2), 427-444

Nazarko, J., Ejdys, J., Halicka, K., Nazarko, Ł., Kononiuk, A., & Olszewska, A. (2017). Structural analysis as an instrument for identification of critical drivers of technology development. Procedia Engineering, 182, 474-481. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.137

Noviana, L., & Sukwika, T. (2020). Pemanfaatan sampah organik sebagai pupuk kompos ramah lingkungan di kelurahan Bhaktijaya Depok. Pengabdian Untukmu Negeri, 4(2), 237-241. doi: 10.37859/jpumri.v4i2.2155

Omran, A., Khorish, M., & Saleh, M. (2014). Structural Analysis with Knowledge-based MICMAC Approach. International Journal of Computer Applications, 86(5), 39-43. doi: 10.5120/14985-3290

Paramita, D., Murtilaksono, K., & Manuwoto. (2018). Kajian pengelolaan sampah berdasarkan daya dukung dan kapasitas tampung prasarana persampahan kota Depok. Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning, 2(2), 104-117. doi: 10.29244/jp2wd.2018.2.2.104-117

Sudirman. (2012). Implementasi 3R melalui bank sampah. Jakarta: Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup

Sujiyanto. (2016). Analisis pengelolaan sampah di bank sampah malang. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 5(3), 115-122

Sukwika, T. (2018). Peran pembangunan infrastruktur terhadap ketimpangan ekonomi antarwilayah di Indonesia. Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan, 6(2), 115-130. doi: 10.14710/jwl.6.2.115-130

Sukwika, T., & Noviana, L. (2020). Status keberlanjutan pengelolaan sampah terpadu di TPST-Bantargebang, Bekasi: Menggunakan rapfish dengan R statistik. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 18(1), 107-118. doi: 10.14710/jil.18.1.107-118