EVALUASI PENERAPAN PROGRAM “PEKA PERISAI” (STUDI KASUS BAGIAN PEMBORAN DAN WOWS PT. PERTAMINA EP ASSET V)

 

 "EVALUATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE “PEKA PERISAI” PROGRAM (CASE STUDY OF THE DRILLING AND WOWS SECTION OF PT. PERTAMINA EP ASSET V)"



Author(s)

Andri Tri Susanto, Maya Dewi Dyah Maharani, Tatan Sukwika

Abstract

Problems in PEP Asset 5 are in the form of unsafe behavior such as lack of knowledge and skills so that they fail to remind, secure, and identify hazards. PEKA PERISAI as an effort to prevent workplace accidents was officially implemented in 2020. This study aims to evaluate the application of PEKA PERISAI, the obstacles in its implementation, and the effect of PEKA PERISAI on K3 in PEP Asset 5. The study uses a qualitative and quantitative approach. Collecting data through interviews, questionnaires, observation, and documentation. Data analysis used ISM (Interpretative Structural Model) to evaluate the objectives and constraints in the application of PEKA PERISAI, and linear regression test to evaluate the effect of PEKA PERISAI on K3 in PEP Asset 5. The driving force is to support the implementation of the Pertamina HSE Golden Rules (Comply, Intervention, and Care), and the second objective is to provide coaching and counseling so that work is carried out safely according to procedures. (2) The evaluation of constraints based on ISM shows that all macro constraints are major obstacles, especially the lack of guidance, guidance, and supervision of hazard control. In 2020, 1,792 unsafe cases were found with 1,517 cases (84.65%) being human error (3) The application of PEKA PERISAI had a positive and significant effect on OHS by 16%, meaning that by increasing PEKA PERISAI, K3 in PEP Asset 5 can also increase..

 
Keywords

evaluation; HSSE; ISM; peka perisai; PEP

 
Full Text:
PDF (Indonesian)
or
PDF (Indonesian) 

 

How to cite:

Susanto, Andri Tri., Maharani, Maya Dewi Dyah., & Sukwika, Tatan. (2021). Evaluasi Penerapan Program “Peka Perisai” (Studi Kasus Bagian Pemboran dan WOWS PT. Pertamina EP Asset V). Jurnal Migasian, 5(2), 21-33 . doi: https://doi.org/10.36601/jurnal-migasian.v5i2.172  

Jurnal MIGASIAN by https://www.ojs.akamigasbalongan.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-migasian/index is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 
 
References 

N. Haworth and S. Hughes, The International Labour Organization.

N. Fridayanti and R. Kusumasmoro, “Penerapan Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja Di PT Ferron Pharmaceuticals Bekasi,” J. Adm. Kant., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 211–234, 2016.

E. A. Marom and B. S. Sunuharyo, “Pengaruh Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi pada Karyawan bagian Produksi Perusahaan PT Lion Metal Works Tbk),” J. Adm. Bisnis, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 187–194, 2018.

W. S. Kuswana, Ergonomi dan K3 (Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.

M. K. Z. Elphiana E.G, Yuliansyah M. Diah, “Pengaruh Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pt. Pertamina Ep Asset 2 Prabumulih,” JEMBATANB- J. Ilm. Manaj. Bisnis Dan Terap., no. 2, pp. 103–118, 2017.

M. D. Cooper, Behavioral Safety a Framework for Success. Indiana: BSMS Inc, 2009.

Eriyatno, Ilmu Sistem Meningkatkan Mutu dan Efektivitas Manajemen. Bogor: IPB Press, 1999.

G. Irawan and B. M. Wibawa, “Analisis Peta Risiko Pengeboran di Wilayah Asset 5 PT Pertamina EP,” J. Manaj. dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 113–125, 2015.

F. I. Khan, R. Sadiq, and T. Husain, “Risk based process safety assesment and control measures design for offshore process facilities,” J.Hazard. Mater., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 1–36, 2002.

R. Rubiandini, Rancangan Teknik Pengeboran dan Komplesi. Bandung: ITB, 2012.

M. D. D. Maharani and D. V. Sara, “Model Struktural Pengelolaan Tempat Penampungan dan Potong Ayam Secara Berkelanjutan Dalam Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan,” in Peran Matematika, Sains, dan Teknologi dalam Mencapai Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan/SDGs, 2018, pp. 69–93.